← Back to Bitcoin Improvement Proposals
BIPinformational

Added clarifications to BIP0009.

I added explicit parameters for deployment at the beginning of the specification. I think this greatly clarifies the spec for someone approaching it for the first time. We've decided for now not to consensus-enforce the bit states, making the RFC language that had been previously proposed a bit superfluous. The only thing that remains consensus-enforced is the moment of activation which should be clear from context.

No reviews
CodeShark·Updated Mar 10, 2016·0 reviews·0 attestations·View source
Collections:BIPs — Merged

Specification

I added explicit parameters for deployment at the beginning of the specification. I think this greatly clarifies the spec for someone approaching it for the first time.

We've decided for now not to consensus-enforce the bit states, making the RFC language that had been previously proposed a bit superfluous. The only thing that remains consensus-enforced is the moment of activation which should be clear from context.

Discussion (0 threads)

Loading discussions...