bip-0322: add another valid sig vector not to confuse
Following [this discussion](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24058/files#r872561862), add another valid sig vector not to confuse developer. It has been misleading some developers, as they think their implementation is wrong even if it's right. This test vector is also included in ongoing implementation of BIP322(PR is closed but seems like still in development [here](https://github.com/luke-jr/bitcoin/commit/f2f4637b16cd956e5923c05154a5eeaf1801ef45))
No reviewsSpecification
Following this discussion, add another valid sig vector not to confuse developer. It has been misleading some developers, as they think their implementation is wrong even if it's right. This test vector is also included in ongoing implementation of BIP322(PR is closed but seems like still in development here)
Discussion (0 threads)
Loading discussions...